html - Which is the easiest cloud for static web content -
i've got few html pages requisite images, css , other bits , pieces, static content no cgi required. host on amazon ec2 image need have , running different application. ideally i'd move hosting of static content off ec2 image it's independent of single ec2 instance. i'd host on 1 of free or @ least pay go cloud options.
the options i've come across are:
windows azure, in case haven't been able .html pages working , if possible mean i'd have update whole windows azure app everytime needed update image? or there easy way static web content served azure blobs?
amazon's s3, think i'd have put qualified url's each html page each image, css etc. file wouldn't bad. seems reasonable option.
google's app engine, spent 10 minutes looking @ seems work well.
wordpress, incorporate html wordpress blog site find themes little bit restrictive, pages can wide etc.
is there easier way?
update:
after further investigation 2 best ways found s3 approach described sug , windows azure blob storage (rather windows azure service).
the difference between s3 , azure blobs how cname can managed:
- for s3 you'll end cname mybucket.mydomain.com
 - for azure you'll end cname *.mydomain.com * represents whatever like. access blobs path *.mydomain.com/container/.
 
so s3 dictates cname host gives full flexibility on resource path. azure gives full flexibility on cname host dictates first part of resource path.
for serving static files, using services appengine or azure on kill.
 simplest solution use aws s3:
 1) no coding required
 2) pricing
 3) can map bucket own domain or subdomain.
 4) free client tools manage buckets dead simple filesystem.
 use s3fox there many others (bucketexplorer example)
Comments
Post a Comment